Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rap rock vs. Rap metal[edit]

Okay, why in the hell do people keep changing the genre in the info-box to "rap rock" when the sources clearly state they're "rap metal"? I don't get this, is this more of this heavy metal elitism going on? Ximmerman (talk) 15:30, 14 June 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]


For those interested in how the current Clawfinger series of articles came to be, see the initial idea and the actual thing. Frenzie


I've reworded the opening and closing paragraphs for a more neutral encyclopedic tone & style. Djbrianuk 02:21, 6 September 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nigger airplay[edit]

I know for a fact that early on more than a few local radio stations in Sweden refused to play "Nigger" as the DJ:s thought it was a racist song, obviously because they had never heard the lyrics. This would be worth mentioning in the article, but unfortunately I have only the word of two DJ:s that they refused airplay, I have no actual proof. If anyone out there has proof, please make the inclusion. It would add value to the article. /HQ —The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk) 13:33, 4 March 2007 (UTC).Reply[reply]

Say.. what about that remix they've done to the song Links 2 3 4 from Rammstein? I think this article's a bit incomplete. (talk) 18:30, 25 December 2008 (UTC)TidusReply[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Clawfinger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:12, 9 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sources do not classify Clawfinger as a nu-metal band[edit]

1. Clawfinger formed before nu-metal even existed. 2. Any website that lists "nu-metal" as their style actually means "rap-metal" and simply conflates the two. 3. In the actual reviews (you got to read those, not just the "genre tags", most of which are added by random people on the Internet), Clawfinger is described as industrial metal/rap metal. -- (talk) 17:40, 16 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Contested deletion[edit]

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (your reason here) --2A02:3033:13:2CA2:1:2:4F52:A7C0 (talk)One of the most popular band in the 90s. Why should this be deleted?? — Preceding undated comment added 07:35, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You need to post a reason that states why they are notable per the guidelines. "most popular band in the 90's" is not an acceptable reason. However, I have already established that they are notable because they have charting albums and meet WP:BAND criteria. Article is safe for now.Zeddedm (talk) 07:58, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Contested deletion[edit]

This band meets WP:BAND criterion #2, as they have charting album. See their album Deaf Dumb Blind and Use Your Brain. Zeddedm (talk) 07:53, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The user trying to delete this article has been carrying out vandalism against this and other articles, and has ignored a level-4 warning. They also sign their messages with a company name rather than their own username. I think we can disregard anything they say at this point as they are clearly not here to build an encyclopedia! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 13:01, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ok thanks for letting me know. Zeddedm (talk) 16:24, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]